All submissions to the RCVE 2027 will be reviewed:
All submissions to the RCVE 2027 will be reviewed, the papers will go through the editorial process consisting of two stages: Preliminary review and Peer-Review
Preliminary Review: RCVE Editors perform an preliminary review of the manuscript's suitability to ensure the submission falls within the scope of the conference upon receipt. Preliminary Review is set to check the fundamental elements of the manuscript such as topic,layout, structure, length, language, originality, references and competing interest etc. And each manuscript will be checked if it has potential problem of plagiarism (iThenticate). Papers not passing the plagiarism checking or the topic is out of the conference will be rejected immediately.
Peer Review: Only the papers passed the preliminary review will be peer-reviewed by 2-3 independent reviewers. Reviewers evaluate submissions based on the requirements of the conference proceedings, predefined criteria, and quality, completeness, originality and grammar of the research presented. Also, reviewers are asked to respond to a short questionnaire that serves as a Reviewer’s checklist and ensures a standardised, comprehensive review.
Authors are required to respond to the peer review comments in details and make minor or major revisions according to the points raised. The revised paper will be evaluated again. Usually, one round of major revisions is allowed. Acceptance is granted when reviewers' recommendations are positive.
Plagiarism:
RCVE is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job of the authors to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also published results / techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are met.
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:
1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)
3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.
4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist”.